TwentyFour is a prominent investor in European asset-backed securities (ABS) markets. From our experience the specialist structures and complexity associated with this asset class makes ESG data gathering more challenging compared to more mainstream bond markets, but we have worked hard with issuers on closing this data gap and have also extended our Observatory model to cover ABS-specific metrics. We believe this proprietary ESG work is unique in the European ABS space, and it is well regarded among our clients and other market participants.
Read our ABS case study
Our scoring system
As an active manager, we don’t rely solely on external ESG data providers or a standalone ESG team within our business to provide our portfolio managers with an ESG score. For true ESG integration we believe portfolio managers must be accountable for judging how ESG factors will impact the value of their investments over time.
We see this more active approach to ESG scoring as particularly important in fixed income, where commercial ESG data coverage is not as comprehensive as it is in the equity markets.
The TwentyFour ESG Score is therefore a unique measure that combines inputs from our ESG data partner with our own analysis.
Learn more about the TwentyFour ESG Score
Our active difference
The TwentyFour ESG scoring system is designed to specifically suit our active management style because it enables us to place a greater emphasis on more nuanced ESG factors such as Engagement, Momentum and Controversies.
Engagement
While fixed income investors do not have voting rights in the way shareholders do, larger firms typically issue bonds multiple times a year, which puts bondholders in a strong position to influence corporate policy by engaging with management on an ongoing basis. We publish a quarterly summary of all our engagements with bond issuers here (under Principle 9), along with details of any resulting investment decisions.
Learn more about Engagement at TwentyFour
Momentum
We believe it can be counter-productive for asset managers to automatically deprive poorer ESG performers of capital. Instead, we would prefer to support companies that can show us a credible and demonstrable plan for improving the areas in which they score badly, which is why a strong Momentum score can increase an issuer’s overall TwentyFour ESG Score.
Read our Momentum case study
Controversies
In our ESG scoring system, Controversies can hurt a company’s overall ESG score very badly, since we believe they can reveal much about a company’s risk management and general governance culture. One negative event may be unavoidable, so the underlying source of the issue is important, but a series of issues may indicate a systemic risk.
Our ESG Observatory
Observatory is the tool that powers our ESG integration approach.
Designed in-house at TwentyFour, Observatory is our very own search engine for the global universe of fixed income – it stores hundreds of data points on over 30,000 bonds and helps us target the relative value opportunities that we think can help boost performance returns.
In Observatory, ESG analysis sits right alongside more traditional bond characteristics like duration, yield and rating – portfolio managers use the platform every day, ensuring ESG analysis is at the core of our regular investment process.
Observatory also enables us to report to clients on several criteria across our portfolios, ranging from the percentage of women on boards to carbon emissions intensity.