Flash Fixed Income: Riding the bumps in credit markets
Key takeaways
- Credit assets generally performed well in the first of half of 2026, despite periodic volatility driven by the Iran war and concerns about AI disruption and private credit.
- Despite broadly strong returns, credit quality has been a notable factor in some asset classes, which for us underscores the importance of credit selection in a tight spread environment.
- We see potential for credit spreads to grind even tighter over the summer, but we stress the importance of dry powder for taking advantage of any opportunities to lock in higher yields.
Euro-denominated credit performed well in the first half of 2026 in the face of elevated macro risks, with subordinated financials and sub-investment grade CLOs posting some of the strongest returns across the sector year-to-date (YTD) after outperforming other segments in 2025.
Returns have not come without volatility, however, with the US-Iran war repricing rate expectations, pressuring government bond yields, and driving periods of credit spread widening as the market priced in the potential for slower growth. While credit spreads have rebounded towards all-time lows, interest rate expectations remain elevated and a number of hikes from developed market central banks this year are now seen as likely.
We view these hikes, if they do happen, as mid-cycle adjustments rather than the start of a hiking cycle. While inflation remains above target and relatively sticky, inflation expectations remain anchored and wage growth in the Eurozone is hovering around levels that are consistent with inflation at 2%. Growth has been resilient, as have labour markets, and as the geopolitical risks dissipate, we would expect oil volatility to decline.
This sets the stage, in our opinion, for a summer grind tighter in credit markets. But with macro risks still elevated and spreads on the tighter end of historical averages, active management of portfolios is key, both from a top-down and bottom-up perspective.
Digging into euro credit returns this year in more detail, we can point to several interesting trends.
First, and most obviously, returns have been positive despite the instability in the Middle East and despite concerns around AI disruption and private credit. Second, spread risk has been (and we think will continue to be) preferable to duration risk. But third, the type of spread risk you are taking matters hugely to returns. BB rated high yield (HY) bonds have outperformed single-B HY on a total return basis, while BB CLOs have outperformed single-B CLOs. Euro Additional Tier 1s (AT1s), which are subordinated bonds issued by mostly investment grade banks, have outperformed all of the above. While CCC HY has beaten the lot, returning 4.2%, we may take this with a heavy pinch of salt after last year’s -2.5% return and given the small size of the index (42 issuers).
The YTD returns shown above in many ways depict the story we have told investors about investing in credit in current conditions (and indeed last year). We have strongly believed that credit risk has been preferable to rates risk (duration) given high all-in yields and what we have viewed as solid corporate and banking sector fundamentals. We also believe that investing across the credit spectrum, including in securitised assets such as CLOs and subordinated financials such as AT1s, can help to maximise risk-adjusted returns through the cycle. Of course, the goal is generally to seek attractive spreads while minimising defaults, as missing the “accidents” can be key to generating excess returns given the inherent negative convexity in credit.
We can take some inspiration from our colleagues in Switzerland, who have recently dusted off their mountain bikes after a cold and snowy winter, to describe the process of investing in credit in the current environment of tight spreads.
The yield on credit is the bike's suspension. More yield equals higher credit breakeven (the level of negative price performance required to wipe out the yield over a year), which equals an increased ability to weather the lumps and bumps of the road. The overall credit risk in the portfolio is the speed you are riding. Faster speeds might be better in the short term but can be worse and more dangerous over the medium term (i.e. more difficult to control when it gets even bumpier). The route you are taking is your concentration. A smaller, narrower path leaves less margin for error. From what? A credit default, the equivalent of flipping over your handlebars. It makes sense to diversify and have multiple riders in your team but having one crash is always costly.
In this environment, when spread suspension is already compressed, we want to proceed cautiously and down lines that offer multiple exit routes. We want all our riders to make it to the finish line, so our credit selection process is focused on identifying companies that we believe are better equipped to ride out the bumpier sections. In practical terms, for us this means focusing on CLOs with clean pools from managers with strong track records, in vintages that we believe offer attractive relative value. It also means favouring national champion banks and insurers in Europe rather than smaller challenger banks, given limited dispersion across the sector. In the corporate space we generally like strong cashflow durability, revenue visibility, and sub-50% loan-to-value paper. In all cases we want conviction in being able to hold positions through the bumps (or worse) that the market provides.
Metaphor over, the last point we would make is on the importance of dry powder, both from a top-down perspective and a bottom-up perspective. We see periodic spread volatility as both inevitable and healthy, so maintaining sufficient liquidity in a portfolio to be able to take advantage of those periods means the potential to lock in higher yields to the benefit of future returns.
Let’s see what the second half of 2026 brings for fixed income managers. Happy riding.
Important Information
The views expressed represent the opinions of TwentyFour as at July 14 2026, they may change, and may also not be shared by other members of the Vontobel Group. This article does NOT express any political views or endorsements, but rather aims to objectively analyse the economic factors and implications. The analysis is based on publicly available information as of the date above and is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice or a personal recommendation. References to holdings and/or other companies for illustrative purposes only and should not be considered a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security discussed herein.
Any projections, forecasts or estimates contained herein are based on a variety of estimates and assumptions. Market expectations and forward-looking statements are opinion, they are not guaranteed and are subject to change. There can be no assurance that estimates or assumptions regarding future financial performance of countries, markets and/or investments will prove accurate, and actual results may differ materially. The inclusion of projections or forecasts should not be regarded as an indication that TwentyFour or the Vontobel Group considers the projections or forecasts to be reliable predictors of future events, and they should not be relied upon as such. We reserve the right to make changes and corrections to the information and opinions expressed herein at any time, without notice.
Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Value and income received are not guaranteed and one may get back less than originally invested. TwentyFour, Vontobel Group, its affiliates and the individuals associated therewith may (in various capacities) have positions or deal in securities (or related derivatives) identical or similar to those described herein.